Sunday, 18 April 2021

Conspiracy Theories.

 

By Willie Drennan


                               Certain people come to mind when thinking about conspiracy theories.


Conspiracy theories come and go. There is usually some element of truth in them or else they would never get off the ground. Sometimes though, people's imaginations run amok with fictitious notions and elements of truth get discredited and discarded.


What we have now, right across the globe, is two opposing conspiracy theories happening at the same time. This is dangerous. There is Conspiracy Theory A and Conspiracy Theory B.


Conspiracy Theory A

This is the belief that a small number of wealthy elite control the world: the global economy, technology, information, education, healthcare and global finances - and that these elites are making use of, or have created, a global virus to justify global lockdowns. The global lockdowns further assert their authority, control and increase their wealth. Digital identification and travel passports will solidify their absolute control over civilisation. Those who comply or offer their skills to further this agenda are rewarded. Dissenting voices are censored, penalised in the workplace and have their liberties restricted.


Conspiracy Theory B

This is the belief that God or the Mother of Nature, or both, have inflicted a plague upon civilisation and that the only way to address this plague (worst ever global virus/flu)  is to tackle it head-on. By using modern technology, science, medical intervention and by shutting down global economy they can save lives. Wealthy global corporations and governments, bolstered by such renowned benevolent institutions as the Bill Gates Foundation and the Tony Blair Institute,  have joined together in the battle to save civilisation.

Friday, 26 March 2021

Global Lockdowns: The World Divided.


By Willie Drennan

Global Lockdowns are dividing communities and families across the globe. There has been no division on such scale since the end of World War Two. Divisions already existed between those who believe in globalisation and those who don't, but since March 2020 the division has moved to a whole other level.

The division now is particularly between those who believe in all aspects of global lockdown and those who do not believe and question, or challenge, the validty of the globalist view.

We are having to chose between belief that global powers are doing their genuine best to tackle the worst global virus in human history  - and belief that severe global lockdowns and mass-vaccination programmes are part of an agenda by global elites to assert their control over humanity.

One of these belief systems is wrong and the other one is right. It is difficult to envisage what a middle-ground position would be.

There are two diametrically opposed opinions and the big problem is that only one of those opinions are promoted to the masses via global mainstream media. The other opinion, held by thousands of practitioners and experts within the fields of healthcare and science, is clinically silenced. Rational debate is silenced.


Regardless of which side we take, surely we should all be concerned about systemic censoring of alternative opinion and freedom of speech?

The following is an overview of the alternative opinion.

Global Lockdowns: March 2020 to present.

Global lockdowns have been draconian and it is astounding that they have now lasted for one full year, with no certainty of coming to a complete end any time soon.

- The governments' promotion of mask wearing, staying at home and social distancing has been continuously broadcast via global mainstream media and every possible communication medium. The whole world knows the message.

 - On the shutting down of the global economy the reasoning and justification has also been broadcast aloud on a relentless daily basis.

- The closing down of small independent business while monstrous global corporations thrive is hotly contested - as is the closing down of the hospitality sector, tourism industry, public concerts, sport and recreation.

- The clampdown of public rallies and street protests against the lockdowns has been extreme across the globe. In previously free and democratic nations, where public protest and questioning of authority has been paramount to the fundamental principles of national constitutions, authoritarianism has become the norm.

- There has been no such assault on human rights and liberties on such scale, in Europe at least, since the Berlin Wall came down.

- The closing down of smaller public gatherings such as in pubs, coffee shops and churches and other social groups, community groups, fraternities, family gatherings who regularly meet - severely curtails public discourse. Throughout history and especially before television and modern communication, the seeds of revolution against tyranny, and seeds of pivotal social change, have been sown in these social settings. In spite of the modern tech this aspect of social discourse and verbal sharing of ideas, concerns and fears has remained prevalent and crucial – up until March 2020.

- The global information network appears to be under the near absolute control of the global corporatists who fund the media. Journalists have been accused of no longer being real journalists but globalist propagandists.

Vaccination  Ask The Experts     

Mass-vaccination has been challenged by many medical and science professionals across the globe, on the following grounds:

- Vaccines are not necessary to stop the spread of Covid.

- Vaccines do not actually help to prevent contacting Covid.

- The vaccines have not gone through the globally-accepted testing process, which includes protocols on testing of animals. 

- The Covid vaccines are dangerous as they create an “Improper Immune Response” which can lead to "a cytokine storm" (See views and work of  Dr Dolores Cahill).  In basic terms, I understand this to mean that these vaccines get our natural immune systems all fired up to potentially dangerous levels.

- These new mRNA vaccines of Pfizer and Moderna are experimental and are essentially a form of gene therapy that may interfere with our DNA. While the Oxford/Astrazenica vaccine is not an mRNA vaccine, it does incorporate DNA techniques.

- It is also claimed that some of the vaccines have ingredients that weaken our natural immune systems.

- That this is likely to result in more deaths from the vaccine than from the virus itself.

- See work and views of Geert Vanden Bossche.  "Mass infection prevention and mass vaccination with leaky Covid-19 vaccines in the midst of the pandemic can only breed highly infectious variants."

- There are also numerous disturbing allegations of dangerous ingredients within the vaccines and claims of links to sinister agendas - all of which are of course enthusistically ridiculed on Google.  I'm not sharing any such relevant links for now until I further research the claims and counter-claims.

Alternative medications.

Trials have been successfully carried out to demonstrate that the existing approved drugs,  Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, have been successful in treating Coronavirus symptoms.

- The alternative medical experts also believe that Vitamin D, Vitamin C and zinc can be very effective in boosting natural immunity as well as alleviating Covid symptoms for those who do not have underlying health issues.

- The claim is that these cheap “safe medications” are not being made available as they would make redundant the need for expensive vaccines.

Testing:

- It is believed the numbers of people who have contacted the virus have been exaggerated due to              large-scale false positives from persistent PCR testing.

- It is believed that the global Covid-19 death toll has been greatly exaggerated by false reasons for death on death certificates.

- Autopsies, in most cases, have not been carried out to confirm cause of death as Covid.

- Travel passports/Health passports are considered unnecessary and a serious infringement on civil liberties and human rights. This brings us in to the territory of "conspiracy theories".

It is important to note that all of the above is totally dismissed by global pharmacists, doctors and media as insane rantings from conspiracy theorists.

Conspiracy theories: 

- There is usually some basic element of truth in conspiracy theories or else no one would would ever pay attention to them at all. It is often the case however that the theorists add 2 and 2 together and get 5 or 6 instead of 4, and so many people dismiss any element of truth that may exist.

- In this case however some of the theories are backed up by open public confirmation by those identified by the theorists.

- The World Economic Forum's annual conference was held in Davos in January 2021. It seems quite clear that the globalist leaders in attendance have much to gain by getting the majority of people across the globe to comply and become dependent on globalisation. They promote a new world order, via a Fourth Industrial Revolution (connected to 5G technology) where Artificial Intelligence (AI) will replace humans who carry out basic tasks in the workplace. The terminology used around such gatherings include Reset Button for Global Economy, Agenda 21, Agenda 30, Smart Grids, Build Back Better and New Normal.

- It becomes not too difficult to understand how “conspiracy theorists” in this case, have added 2 and 2 together and arrived at the 4th Industrial Revolution, and a conclusion that global pandemics and global lockdowns have been engineered to facilitate number4.  

- It is difficult for many people to understand what motivates the alternative scientific practitioners - the so-called conspiracy theorists. It is worth pointing out however that the medical and science professionals who challenge the global lockdown strategy stand to lose their careers and professional credibility. Many have already been suspended from their positions and many more cancelled by social media and platforms such as YouTube. 

Further reading and video links:

 The New Normal: documentary film: The New Normal. Very professionally produced. Disturbing.

 Great Barrington Declaration Signed by over 55,000 epidemiologists, public health scientists and medical practitioners who have grave concerns that Covid-19 policies are damaging physical and mental health. October 2020.

Related videos: BrandNew Tube 

Anna Brees  Former ITV and BBC TV presenter posts regular interviews with medical and science experts on YouTube.  Also see the prolific Twitter account @BreesAnna. 

Concluding considerations.

It seems evident to me that there are millions of people across the globe who have genuine concerns and fears about lockdowns, vaccines and globalist agenda. The millions include tens of thousands of practitioners in the relevant fields of medicine and science who have voiced their concerns - and probably hundreds of thousands who are fearful to speak out publicly.

Has the global lockdown and global economy reset been put in place to deal with the global pandemic or has the global pandemic been set up to facilitate the global lockdown and global economy reset?

The alternative science seems like something that should be considered in rational public debate. Surely if the alternative science is so insane it can easily be exposed, ridiculed, rejected and permanently flung in the bin - so that we can all just move on?

Surely the fact that the counter science is clinically silenced and censored on such a rigorous global scale should cause others to research and consider, with open minds, the concerns and fears of millions of their fellow human beings? 

Surely everyone in positions of influence has a responsibilty to genuinely research and consider all expert opinion: all possible explanations and justifications for this most dangerous and pivotal moment in the history of humanity?

The purpose of my blog is to call for the alternative science to be allowed a voice while still holding on to shreds of hope that the global lockdown strategies do have the best interests of humanity at heart.

It is as much about challenging the global censoring and silencing of rational debate: about defending fundamental rights and freedoms of humanity, as it is about seeking truth and detailed evidence.

Surely if those who challenge the status quo are all crazy nutcases, it would be best to engage them in a global mainstream media debate: to expose and decisively relegate them to the zone of a dangerous fringe?

I'm trying to keep an open mind, but I must say; if mandatory vaccination and health passports for travel, entrance to theatres, pubs, restaurants, churches and sporting events, becomes a thing: the conspiracy theorists can sign me up as one of their own. After all they have been predicting perpetual lockdowns and travel/health passports for a year now.



Thursday, 25 February 2021

NI Protocol: Alternatives?



By Willie Drennan

I have been railing against the NI Protocol from the moment this devious assault on fundamental principles and rights was announced.

Pro-EU and pro-Protocol people often chide, scoff and smugly ask “what are the alternatives?”  Fair enough.


Basically, I have long held optimism that Brexit, after initial dangerous times, could lead to Glorious Opportunity  for the ancient divisions in Ireland to be permanently sealed away behind some glass case in a museum. More on that coming up.

First of all, on the short term, there are simple alternatives to the ludicrous Sea Border aspect of the Protocol. There is really no need at all for a hard border – anywhere within the British Isles. The movement of goods between EU and any part of the UK can be registered, monitored, traced and checked at any point of transaction: at source and destination or at at any point of transport in between.

 Occasional physical checks on vehicles transporting goods in either direction can take place at any time and anywhere. Such checks do not need to take place at a border post to disrupt flow of travel. All this can be assisted by mutual cross-border enforcement and sharing of cross-border intelligence.

The short-term alternatives and mutually beneficial solutions could really be that simple if there was a genuine will for them to happen.


The longer-term and even more crucial problem with the Protocol is more complex to remedy. The Protocol rides roughshod over the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement of 1998, The Act of Union of 1801 and the ignored  Common Travel Area.


Politically, a petition to invoke Article 16 of the Protocol has been received by the UK government and will hopefully be debated at Westminster. Article 16 allows a unilateral challenge to any aspect of the protocol that appears to cause economic or societal harm. This in itself will not solve the problems of the protocol as any discrepancies are first of all debated by the EU's Joint Committee, then by the EU's Arbitration Panel, and all over-seen by the EU's European Court of Justice. The EU have good reason to confidently believe they have the legalities all sussed.

It is still important for Article 16 to be triggered and debated so that the public can have some understanding of what has taken place and what is going on.


A legal action against the protocol has also been initiated and has the wide support of Unionists in Northern Ireland as well as prominent people in Great Britain. This is on the basis that the NI Protocol breaches the Act of Union, implemented in 1801, and the Agreement of 1998.

Once again the EU, the Tony Blair Institute, pro-EU political elites in UK and Irish Nationalists all believe they have all the legal loopholes covered: as part of their Weaponisation of the Irish Border Strategy.  They probably have good reason for their smug confidence because they know that the Belfast/ Good Friday Agreement was necessarily vague: with essential “constructive ambiguity” and unconstructive ambiguity.  

This essentially means it can be interpreted in any way by any justice system that might want to interpret it to suit their needs. The Protocol gives license to the EU and its ECJ to use, abuse and interpret to suit its agenda.


The UK courts may rule that the NI Protocol breaches both the Act of 1800/01 and the 1998 Agreement.


In which case alternatives need to be sought regardless of what the EU think.


On the other hand the UK courts may decide that the protocol breaches the purpose and spirit of the previous legislation, or something similar in their jargon, but does not legally breach anything.


In which case alternatives still need to be sought regardless of what the EU think.


I say this as it will still be the case that the vast majority of unionists will remain convinced that the constitutional promises made to them have been blatantly breached. Regardless of what any court decides the legal position to be, the Belfast Agreement and NI Protocol will be unsustainable and unworkable anyway.

So, regardless of judicial or political de:isions, the pro-EU and pro- protocol contingent are quite right to ask what the alternatives are to the EU's elaborately-contrived grand scheme.

On the short term what is required is cool heads all around. On the longer term everyone on the island of Ireland, and indeed everyone in the British Isles as a whole, need to consider and debate a way forward that could be mutually beneficial and economically stabilising. We should all be thinking about alternatives to the Protocol that would offer peace and stability for future generations.

In recent times relationships within Northern Ireland and relationships between the Republic of Ireland and the UK have been positive and mutually respectful - perhaps more so than at any time in history. Well, that was up until recently when the EU managed to pull the ancient trick of divide and conquer. EU supporters will of course blame it all on Brexit and pro-Brexit politicians, but that is now a redundant debate because we are where we are.

This is what is happening on the island of Ireland right now. Along with elite politicians and their devotees in Ireland and UK, the EU has stolen the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement from all of the people

The Irish political elite are no longer either Free Staters or Irish Republicans. They seem to have lost respect for their forbears who campaigned for, and fought and died for, liberty from a foreign power.


It will seem unrealistic to project for an independent Irish nation once again, in these times when a clear majority still seem to support the notion that “Ireland is the EU” -  to quote Leo Varadkar. But there is a movement for Irish freedom and it is surely bound to grow the more it becomes evident the EU couldn't care less about the Irish people. The movement for "Irexit" is surely bound to grow as it becomes more evident that the EU will use and abuse the people, in any of their states, whenever considered necessary to solidify and expand the EU's power base.


This should be at least considered as a potential alternative.


This would mean that, while the Republic of Ireland would have its independence again, the people in Northern Ireland would have the same connection to the rest of Ireland as the rest of the UK would have. 

The border would be back to being invisible while people in Northern Ireland would retain its present place and democratic freedoms within the United Kingdom.

An independent ROI would have free trade with its closest market and benefit from an independent UK's new trade deals across the globe.

An independent ROI would secure the Common Travel Area Agreement with the UK as it would no longer be susceptible to potential EU interference.

Should there develop a clear desire for a border poll, as allowed for in the 1998 Agreement, that could take place in a more suitable peaceful and stable environment. The people could decide if they wanted to change who they paid their taxes to, and which flags to fly, at that point. A Border Poll/ 2nd EU Referendum is currently highly improbable for obvious reasons.

It is even possible that an independent Ireland could have a different relationship with the EU than the UK currently has: as part of EFTA perhaps? It is even possible that an independent Ireland could have the best of both worlds if the majority in Ireland wanted that.


All this may seem just fanciful, unrealistic day-dreaming, but at least it as an attempt at positive alternatives. The situation that the EU is currently imposing offers more of the same old story of having unnecessary bitter divisions thrust upon us by external authoritarians: the same old story of the people being divided and conquered yet again.